2010, № 3

1. Afonichkina, N.V. The Realization of the international right in the field of human rights in the light of the interaction between international and state right: textbook / N.V. Afonichkina. — Orenburg: Publishing Centre OGAU, 2006. — P. 12.

2. Vasilieva, E.G. The Main international standards of the criminal justice system / E.G. Vasilieva // Omsk University Vestnik. — Series "Law" — 2008. — №1 (14 — P. 126.

3. Refer to: Viennese convention on the right of the international agreements: commentary. — M., 1997. — P. 68-70.

4. Durga (Doerga) against the Netherlands (the complaint N 50210/99) Resolution of the European Court on Human Rights. Strasbourg, April 27 2004 // SPS "Guarantor-Maximum".

5. Enikeev, Z.D. The Special status of generally recognized principles and norms of the international right and problems to their realization in Russian criminal– proceedings legislation / Z.D. Enikeev // Vestnik OGU. — 2006. — 3. — P. 73.

6. Kremie against France. ESPCH Decision on February 25, 1993 Ser A No 256-B // SPS "Guarantor — MAKSIMUM".

7. Kryuslen (Kruslin) against France. The Court decision on April 24, 1990. Short unofficial interpretation of the case’s circumstances; Refer to: Durga (Doerga) against the Netherlands (the complaint N 50210/99 The European Court on Human Rights’ Resolution. Strasbourg, April 27 2004 // SPS "Guarantor-Maximum".

8. Refer to: Nasonov, S.A. The Right on inviolability the home / S.A. Nasonov // http://sergei-nasonov.narod.ru/Home.doc.

9. Prokofieva, S.M. Humanistic beginings of criminal proceedings: dis. cand. law. sciences / S.M. Prokofieva. — SPB., 1999. — P. 164.

10. Chepman against the United Kingdom. The Complaint №27238/95. The European Court on Human Rights’ Resolution on January 18, 2001 // SPS "Guarantor — STROYMAKSIMUM".

About this article