Vestnik On-line
Orenburg State University named after V.A. Bondarenko october 29, 2026   RU/EN
false
Headings of Vestnik
Pedagogics
Psychology
Other

Search
Vak
Антиплагиат
Orcid
Viniti
ЭБС Лань
Rsl
Лицензия Creative Commons

September 2026, № 3 (251), pages 14-19

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-251-14

Bolodurina I.P., Poyarkova E.N., Nevolina V.V. DESIGNING AN IN-HOUSE CORPORATE TRAINING PROGRAM FOR SYSTEM ANALYSTS IN A LARGE IT COMPANYThis paper presents the methodological experience of designing an in-house corporate training program for system analysts developed for a large IT company facing a persistent shortage of qualified specialists in systems and business analysis. The relevance of the study is determined by the need to establish effective corporate training mechanisms capable of rapidly developing employees’ professional competencies in accordance with the current demands of the digital economy, industry standards, and the practical requirements of IT projects. The purpose of the study is to analyze the structure, content, and methodological principles underlying the design of a corporate training program aimed at developing the professional competencies of system analysts and preparing them for real-world professional activities. The empirical basis of the study is a registry of educational artifacts serving as a structured working document that contains information on learning outcomes, module content, teaching methods, instructional formats, digital learning environments, software tools, and the distribution of responsibilities among subject-matter experts. The research employed methods of scientific and regulatory literature analysis, content analysis of the training program structure, and comparison of its components with the requirements of the Russian Professional Standard “System Analyst,” the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge (BABOK® Guide), and the ADDIE instructional design model. The findings demonstrate that the program consists of an entry diagnostic assessment, five thematic modules, team-based and individual practical assignments, and a final assessment of learning outcomes. Particular attention is paid to implementing the competency-based approach and the principles of andragogy through practice-oriented and blended learning, the use of integrated case studies, and modern professional tools for systems analysis, business process modeling, information systems architecture design, and API development. The paper substantiates the advantages of the proposed corporate training model and identifies directions for its further improvement, including the implementation of Kirkpatrick’s four-level training evaluation model and the development of post-training learner support mechanisms.Key words: corporate training; system analyst; business analysis; competency-based approach; andragogy; ADDIE model; BABOK Guide; blended learning; instructional design; training effectiveness evaluation.

Download
References:

1. On Approval of the Professional Standard “System Analyst”: Order of the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of the Russian Federation No. 367n, April 27, 2023 (registered by the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on May 25, 2023, No. 73453).

2. Lukanina M.V. and Merkulova, S.G. (2023). The ADDIE Model in Instructional Design: Practical Experience of NUST MISIS. Higher Education in Russia, 32(10), 151–166. URL: https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-10-151-166

3. Moiseeva M.V., Polat E.S., Bukharkina M.Yu. and Nezhurina M.I. (2004). Internet-Based Learning: Instructional Design Technologies. Moscow: Cameron Publishing House.

4. Drugova E.A., Veledinskaya S.B., Zhuravleva I.I. and Dorofeeva M.Yu. (2021). Using Instructional Design Tools to Ensure the Quality of Blended Learning. Tomsk: Tomsk State University Press.

5. A Guide to the Business Analysis Body of Knowledge (BABOK® Guide). Version 3.0. Toronto: International Institute of Business Analysis (IIBA), 2015.

6. Knowles M.S. (1980). The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Andragogy. Moscow. (Russian translation).

7. Fowler M. (2004). UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language (3rd ed.). Boston: Addison-Wesley.

8. Kirkpatrick D.L. and Kirkpatrick J.D. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

9. Kovaleva M.N., Shibaev D.V. and Sinitsyna T.I. (2021). Metrics for Evaluating the Effectiveness of Distance Learning in Teaching Social Sciences and Humanities. International Research Journal, 3-3(105), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.23670/IRJ.2021.105.3.068

10. Wiegers K. and Beatty J. (2013). Software Requirements (3rd ed.). Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press.

11. ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018. Systems and Software Engineering — Life Cycle Processes — Requirements Engineering. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization, 2018.

12. Object Management Group. (2011). Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), Version 2.0. Needham, MA: OMG.

13. Object Management Group. (2017). OMG Unified Modeling Language (OMG UML), Version 2.5.1. Needham, MA: OMG.

14. Newman S. (2021) Building Microservices: Designing Fine-Grained Systems (2nd ed.). Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.

15. Kleppmann M. (2017). Designing Data-Intensive Applications: The Big Ideas Behind Reliable, Scalable, and Maintainable Systems. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.

16. Fielding R.T. (2000). Architectural Styles and the Design of Network-based Software Architectures. Doctoral dissertation. University of California, Irvine.

17. Evans E. (2003). Domain-Driven Design: Tackling Complexity in the Heart of Software. Boston: Addison-Wesley.


About this article

Authors: Bolodurina I.P., Poyarkova E.N., Nevolina V.V.

Year: 2026

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-251-14

Editor-in-chief
Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

Crossref
Cyberleninka
Doi
Europeanlibrary
Googleacademy
scienceindex
worldcat
© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет имени В.А. Бондаренко (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru
1999–2026 © CIT OSU