|
|
|
Khlyzova T.A.,Fedorova O.A., Sivkova E.I PATHOLOGICAL INFLUENCE OF SALIVA OF BLOOD-SICKING DIPTEROUS INSECTS ON THE HUMAN BODY AND ANIMALS (REVIEW) [№ 7 ' 2017] In article the data on pathological influence of saliva of gadflies, mosquitoes, midges and mokrets which are available in literature on an organism of prokormitel are generalized. Saliva of mosquitoes is toxic for animals and the person. In places of stings at cattle inflammatory processes develop, body temperature increases, pulse and respiration become frequent, the level of a hemoglobin and quantity of erythrocytes in a blood goes down, the percent of lymphocytes is enlarged, the general condition of an organism worsens. Saliva of midges, contains enzyme to an apiraz and possesses strong hemolytic action and antikoagulyativny activity. Poison in saliva ÓÉÍÕÌÉÉÄ possesses toxic action and firmness. He doesn’t lose the toxic properties when heating to 100 œC within 2 hours and is neutralized by alkali with liquid ammonia. As a part of saliva of gadflies there is a substance similar to a hirudin, anticlotting. Therefore during mass attack of gadflies at animals body temperature increases, appetite is lost, the febricula, delicacy and other phenomena of the general intoxication of an organism develops. Animal of a wood louse do more harm, than to people. Because of the continued of stings of mokrets on separate body parts of animals with thin skin often there are local inflammatory processes and ulcers. Stings of some blood-sicking flies including mokrets, can cause an identical clinical picture of an epizoonoz at whom the hakrakter and extent of response of a skin of an object of a krovososaniye depends on its immunologic reactivity. Toxic effect of saliva is one of aspects of harmful impact of blood-sicking dipterous insects on a human body and animals. With a high number of the attacking bloodsuckers intoxication can have serious value and be shown as external signs in the form of inflammatory processes in a skin, so by change of physiological indicators, such as body temperature and a blood count.
Sivkova E.I., Khlyzova T.A., Fyodorova O.A. SOME ASPECTS OF STUDYING OF NASOPHARYNGEAL GADFLIES (SEM.OESTRIDAE) IN SIBERIA [№ 3 ' 2017] For Siberia wide hozyaystvennoš— representatives of three genus of nasopharyngeal gadflies have economic value (r.šOestrusšL., p.šCephenomyiašLatr, r.šRhinoestrusšBr.,). The analysis of scientific materials has shown that 122šexperts 34šresearch establishment have devoted to their studying the researches (NRU). In the study r.šOestrusšL. attended by 69šresearchers, p.šCephenemyiašLatr.š— 32 and 21 r.šRhinoestrusšBr.š—š21. Development of means and methods of protection of sheep against a nasopharyngeal gadfly (42.7š%) was the main direction of researches and the most productive, environmental issues, methodologies occupy 30.7š% and epizootologiyaš— 16.2š%. In other regions these works, except for the Chita region, have made in general across Eastern Siberiaš— 18.9š%, to the Far Eastš— 13.8š% of total amount. Reduced animal productivity losses due to parasitic diseases is a problem, the relevance of which is indisputable. The sheep to diseases related Estrosi, reindeer herdingš— tsefenomiyoz in horse breedingš— rinestroz. Western Siberia as zone of the most developed sheep breeding (Altai, Sayan Mountains, Zauralie), especially needed carrying out such researches as ÜÓÔÒÏÚ (a false vertyachka) annually carried away up to 6–10.0š% of sick sheep from life, as causes high share of participation of scientists in this region (67.2š%). Environmental issues (29.0š%), protection of deer (27.9š%) and epizootologiya (23.4š%) belong to the main directions of researches of scientists of a tsefenomiyoz. Data on the executed researches demonstrate that in general 97šscientists and experts have devoted to studying of a rinestroz the researches. 65.9š% have executed researches in Western Siberia from them, 27.8š% in Eastern Siberia. 25.7š% are devoted to development of means and methods of protection of horses against a gadfly, epizootologiyaš— 24.7š% and ecologyš— 18.5š%.
|
|
Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|