Vestnik On-line
Orenburg State University july 18, 2024   RU/EN
Headings of Vestnik
Pedagogics
Psychology
Other

Search
Vak
Антиплагиат
Orcid
Viniti
ЭБС Лань
Rsl
Лицензия Creative Commons

May 2024, № 2 (242), pages 77-83

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-242-77

Trufanova P.S., Edygeeva A.T., Kulish N.V. MATHEMATICAL METHODS FOR RISK ASSESSMENT AT UNDERGROUND GAS STORAGE FACILITIES OF THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRYTo assess and calculate the risk of accidents at an oil and gas enterprise, in particular at underground gas storage facilities, mathematical methods are used. The variety of mathematical methods leads to the problem of choosing the most convenient and practical method for calculating the risk of accidents by a specialist. In our study, the solution to the problem was achieved by analyzing quantitative methods based on mathematics and qualitative methods. The methods were selected in accordance with our chosen factors and evaluation criteria. The key factor when choosing methods for assessment was the versatility of the methods, namely the possibility of their application not only for underground gas storage facilities, but also for other facilities in the oil and gas industry, as well as for other industries. The authors of the study identified the accuracy of the method as another important factor when choosing methods when considering the influence of a system of factors on the object of an oil and gas enterprise. Also, when comparing methods, the factor of the presence of mathematical calculations in one or another qualitative and quantitative method for assessing the risk of accidents at an oil and gas industry facility was selected. To solve the problem, logical methods, compilation of a comparative table, analysis of the resulting comparative table, as well as a review of literature sources on the research topic were used. The most universal and multifunctional of these methods are the qualitative method of the systems approach and the quantitative method of a number of calculated indicators.Key words: mathematical methods, risk assessment, qualitative methods, quantitative methods, oil and gas enterprise, gas storage facilities, production factors, accidents, underground gas storage, risk of accidents.

Download
References:

1. Federal Service for Supervision of Consumer Rights Protection and Human Welfare: registers. URL: https://www.rospotrebnadzor.ru/ (accessed 12/01/2023)

2. Zinovieva A.A. (2022) Analysis of industrial risk models at an oil and gas enterprise. Man. Sign. Technique. Samara: Samara National Research University named after Academician S.P. Korolev, pp. 36–42.

3. Ispanbetov T.K. (2014) Issues of methodology for assessing production risks at enterprises of the oil and gas industry. Current problems of economics and management at enterprises of mechanical engineering, oil and gas industry in an innovation-oriented economy, vol. 1, pp. 60–65.

4. Maksimenko V.N. (2017) Basic approaches to the analysis and assessment of information security risks. Economics and quality of communication systems, No. 2.

5. Melnikova D.A. (2016) Theoretical and practical aspects of building an industrial safety management system at hazardous production facilities (using the example of Gazprom Transgaz Samara LLC). PhD Dissertation, 120 p.

6. Tymul E.I. (2021) Selection of a method for qualitative and quantitative risk analysis for energy enterprises. Science and technology, No. 1, pp. 83–90.

7. Komzolov A.A., Kirichenko T.V., Barkhatov V. D. and Manezheva M.V. (2023) Quantitative assessment of professional risks based on determining the costs of ensuring the life and health of workers. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 6: Economics, vol. 58, No. 5, pp. 134–161. DOI 10.55959/MSU0130-0105-6-58-5-7. EDN LDCSRS.

8. Efremov S.V., Ulyanov A.I. and Ulyanova A.G. (2022) Development of an approach to assessing the effectiveness of professional risk management. XXI century: results of the past and problems of the present plus, vol. 11, No. 4(60), pp. 233–237. DOI 10.46548/21vek-2022-1160-0036. EDN ZMSYBM.

9. Cherny K.A., Fainburg G.Z. and Rosenfeld E.A. (2021) Methodological problems of assessing professional risks at mining enterprises and their solution. Subsoil use, vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 193–200. DOI 10.15593/2712-8008/2021.4.8. EDN NRCVFT.

10. Martynov I.S., Misyuryaev V.Yu., Sadovnikov M.A. and Guzenko E.Yu. (2018) Dependence of the safety of agricultural workers on the assessment of professional risks. News of the Nizhnevolzhsky Agro-University Complex: Science and Higher Professional Education, No. 2(50), pp. 355–362. EDN YQTCJV.

11. Balandovich B.A., Martynenko A.I., Shirokostup S.V. et al. (2021) Methodological approaches to conducting a comprehensive assessment of labor protection and industrial safety at a modern enterprise. Notes of a scientist, No. 11-1, pp. 237–243. EDN DPODKN.

12. Sadovnikov M.A., Popov G.G., Semin D.V. and Ryzhkova A.A. (2019) The role of the system for assessing professional risks in the occupational safety management system in an organization. Bulletin of Agrarian Science of the Don, No. 4(48), pp. 102–107. EDN LWWBJB.

13. Goncharuk T. N. (2022) Analysis of safety culture to minimize occupational injuries. XXI century: results of the past and problems of the present plus, vol. 11, No. 3(59), pp. 210–217. DOI 10.46548/21vek-2022-1159-0033. EDN ZRMFRU.

14. Vaulin V.I. (2019) Theoretical foundations of training students in the field of life safety. News of Saratov University. New series. Series: Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy, vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 212–215. DOI 10.18500/1819-7671-2019-19-2-212-215. EDN ITUYIW.

15. Bulanova A.V., Pushenko S.L. and Staseva E.V. (2019) The importance of assessing professional risks in the occupational safety management system. Safety of technogenic and natural systems, No. 1, pp. 2–7. DOI 10.23947/2541-9129-2019-1-2-7. EDN YXBVLN.


About this article

Authors: Trufanova P.S., Edygeeva A.T., Kulish N.V.

Year: 2024

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-242-77

Editor-in-chief
Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

Crossref
Cyberleninka
Doi
Europeanlibrary
Googleacademy
scienceindex
worldcat
© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru
1999–2024 © CIT OSU