|
|
|
November 2023, № 4 (240), pages 185-191doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-240-185
Lopanova E.V. METHODICAL ASPECTS OF CRITERIA ASSESSMENT AT THE UNIVERSITYTo create conditions for supporting active independent learning, coordinating the organization of control with the content and structure of the program, and an effective tool for improving the quality of education, it is possible to use criterion-based assessment as a student-centered learning technology. The existing assessment system in higher education reflects the result of knowledge acquisition. In the conditions of the competency-based learning paradigm in higher education, another mechanism for assessment and control activities of all participants in the educational process is needed. Accordingly, it is necessary to develop and verify technologies, techniques and organizational assessment procedures. Criteria-based assessment, which is understood as a process based on comparison of students’ educational achievements with criteria corresponding to the goals and content of education, is a dynamic procedure for students’ self-assessment of educational and professional activities, ensuring individual progress and motivation. Criteria-based assessment is represented by the integration of formative and summative assessment practices. Summative assessment is aimed at establishing the level of mastery of a competency or planned result. Formative assessment is a new pedagogical tool that corresponds to modern educational values and is based on targeted learning support that actualizes the student’s educational independence. There are methodological features of the preparation and organization of criteria-based assessment of educational results at a university. Since learning can only be effective for an internally motivated student, the student himself must be an active “element” of the learning process, aimed at the subjective “discovery” of new knowledge and skills, including in the process of assessing his own educational achievements.Key words: criterion assessment, student-centered learning technology, summative assessment, formative assessment, healthsaving exam technology.
References:
1. Altynbekova, U.Zh. (2020) Criteria-based assessment as a source of learning and teaching. Young scientist, No. 8 (298), pp. 324-326.
2. Bodogni, M.A. (2020) Foreign and domestic experience in using modern technologies in formative assessment. Domestic and foreign pedagogy, vol. 1, No. 3 (68), pp. 78−95. Available at: https://publications.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/direct/382850089.pdf (accessed: 07.23.2020)
3. Bolotov, V. A. (2018) Past, present and possible future of the Russian system for assessing the quality of education. Issues of Education, No. 3, pp. 287−297. DOI: 10.17323/1814-9545-2018-3-287-297
4. Emelyanova, I.N., Teplyakova, O.A. and Efimova, G.Z. (2019) Practice of using modern assessment methods at different levels of education.Education and Science, No. 21 (6), pp. 9−28. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2019-6-9-28
5. Zhanatbekova, N.Zh., Abdulaeva, A.B. and Boribekova, F. (2019) Implementation of a criteria-based assessment system in the preparation of future teachers. Current issues of education and science, No. 1 (67), pp. 57-60.
6. Zhumalieva, B.M. (2022) Formative type of assessment in the structure of criteria-based assessment of educational achievements. Student Bulletin, No. 11-1 (203), pp. 37-38.
7. Zemlyanskaya, E.N. (2020) Criteria-based assessment of educational achievements of university students. Pedagogy. Questions of theory and practice, vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 142-147.
8. Zemlyanskaya, E.N. (2015) New forms of assessing the educational results of students. Psychological and pedagogical research, vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 103-114. DOI: 10.17759/psyedu.2015070
9. Legostaev, B.L. (2020) The place of the concepts of formative and criteria-based assessment in the problems of modern research on pedagogical assessment. In the collection: Analysis of the problems of implementing the results of innovative research and ways to solve them. Collection of articles of the International Scientific and Practical Conference. Ufa, p. 159-161.
10. Lopanova, E.V. and Galyanskaya, E.G. (2015) Organization of student-centered learning at a medical university. International Journal of Applied and Basic Research, No. 8-4, pp. 751-754
11. Mukanova, R.Zh. and Iskakova, G.S. (2022) Criteria-based assessment as a new approach to assessment in a modern school. Sciences of Europe, No. 91-1 (91), pp. 52-57.
12. Podgainy, E.V. and Demina, N.F. (2021) Some methodological aspects of the implementation of formative assessment as the basis of criteria-based assessment technology. In the collection: Modern problems of mathematics, physics and physico-mathematical education. Materials of the XI International Scientific and Practical Conference. Orekhovo-Zuevo, pp. 240-245.
13. Serkina, V.A., Birkina, A.F. and Ryutina, L.N. (2019) Criteria-based approach to assessing self-control of university students. Colloquium-Journal, No. 7-5 (31), pp. 67-69.
14. Shadrikov, V.D. and Shadrikova, I.A. (2018) Pedagogical assessment: textbook [Electron. resource] Moscow: University Book, 156 p. Available at: https://publications.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/direct/286820966.pdf (accessed: 12/07/2020)
15. Shmigirilova, I. B., Rvanova, A.S. and Grigorenko, O.V. (2021) Assessment in education: current trends, problems and contradictions (review of scientific publications). Education and Science, Volume 23, No. 6. DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639 ISSN 1994-5639 (Print), 2310-5828 (on-line)
16. Cisterna D. and Gotwals A.W. (2018) Enactment of Ongoing Formative Assessment: Challenges and Opportunities for Professional Development and Practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education, Vol. 29(3), pp. 200−222. DOI: 10.1080/1046560X.2018.1432227
17. Hill J. and West H. (2020) Improving the student learning experience through dialogic feed-forward assessment. Assessment " Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 45(1), pp. 82−97. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2019.1608908
18. Lau, A.M. (2016) Formative good, summative bad? – A review of the dichotomy in assessment literature. Journal of Further and Higher Education, Vol. 40 (4), pp. 509–525. DOI: 10.1080/0309877X.2014.984600
19. Ling, L., Yuen, B., Loo, W. and Prinsloo, C. (2020) Students’ Conceptions of Bell Curve Grading Fairness in Relation to Goal Orientation and Motivation. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, Vol. 14(1). DOI: 10.20429/ijsotl.2020.140107.
20. Taras, M. (2007) Assessment for Learning: understanding theory to improve practice. Journal of Further and Higher Education, Vol. 31(4), pp. 363−371. DOI: 10.1080/0309877070162574
About this article
Author: Lopanova E.V.
Year: 2023
doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-240-185
|
|
Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|