|
|
|
June 2019, № 3 (221), pages 21-27doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-221-21
Gladkih V.G. TARGET DOMINANT OF INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES OF PROFESSIONAL TRAINING BACHELOR PRACTICAL READINESS FORMATIONThe modern system of vocational education is focused on the needs of a potential employer in skilled workers. The specified qualification of the bachelor predetermines his professional mission of the teacher of College which is also the supposed object of employment. The need of the employer is characterized by the formed practical readiness of the future teacher to carry out high-quality education of students, and its target dominants are the skills that provide productive results of mastering the profession in interactive learning. With regard to the specifics of the practical readiness of the future teacher at the College among the priority activities, regardless of the content of the disciplines studied is considered educational and methodical. That is why the practical readiness of the bachelor of vocational training is associated with the ability to develop evaluation tools for training, to design their instrumental and technological efficiency and productivity in the implementation of diagnosis and measurement of the quality of education of students in College. The formation of these skills is carried out in the study of specific disciplines, respectively, the real prerequisites of the set of target dominants are created. The most expedient and effective way to achieve this goal is the widespread use of active and interactive forms and methods of pedagogical interaction, the inclusion of students in productive activities, which are essentially necessary elements of interactive learning technology. The target dominants of its application in the formation of practical readiness are communicative interaction of students, intensively and purposefully managing and directing the development of evaluation tools.Key words: target dominants, interactive technologies, practical readiness, bachelor of professional training.
References:
1. Buldasheva O.V. Metodicheskoe obespechenie podgotovki budushchih bakalavrov k resheniyu professional’nyh zadach. Diskussiya [Discussion], 2015, no. 11(63), pp. 108-114.
2. Vanieva V.Y. Teoreticheskie i prikladnye aspekty realizacii praktiko-orientirovannoj sistemy podgotovki pedagogicheskih kadrov. Azimut nauchnyh issledovanij: pedagogika i psihologiya [Azimuth of scientific research: pedagogy and psychology], 2016, vol. 5, no. 1 (14), pp. 24-26.
3. Vetrov Y., Klushina N. Praktikoorientirovannyj podhod. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii [Higher education in Russia], 2002, no. 6, pp. 43-46. URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/praktikoorientirovannyypodhod
4. Gladkih V. G., Еmetc M. S. Formirovanie professional’no-pedagogicheskoj gotovnosti bakalavra tekhnologicheskogo obrazovaniya kak nauchnaya problema. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2011, no. 2., pp. 133-138.
5. Golub A.V. Formirovanie innovacionnoj professional’no-obrazovatel’noj sredy. Professional’noe obrazovanie i rynok truda [Vocational education and the labour market], 2015, no. №5/6, pp.13-15.
6. Kargapolova O.A. Praktikoorientirovannoe obuchenie kak uslovie povysheniya kachestva podgotovki sovremennogo pedagoga. Obshchestvo, nauka, obrazovanie: tendencii i perspektivy razvitiya: kollektivnaya monografiya po rezul’tatam nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem. [Society, science, education: trends and prospects of development: a collective monograph on the results of scientific and practical conference with international participation], 2018, pp. 179-183.
7. Klarin, M.V. Innovacionnoe obrazovanie: konceptual’nye vyzovy dlya didaktiki. Innovacionnyj potencial didakticheskih issledovanij [Innovative potential of didactic research], 2014, no. 4., pp. 54-62.
8. Shajhutdinova G.A. Aktual’nye problemy professional’no — lichnostnogo stanovleniya budushchego specialista. Kazanskij pedagogicheskij zhurnal [Kazan pedagogical journal], 2010, no. 4, pp.156-162.
9. Shemet B.I., Shemet O.V. Realizaciya FGOS SPO: vnutrennie problemy. Innovacionnye proekty v obrazovanii [ Innovative projects in education], 2014, no. 6, pp. 45-48.
10. Abykanova B., Yelezhanova S., Kabylkhamit Z., Sabirova Z., Nugumanova S. The use of interactive learning technology in institutions of higher learning. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 2016, vol. 11, no 18, pp. 12528-12539.
11. Bloom B.S. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals: Handbook I, cognitive domain. New York: Longman, 1956, pp. 207.
12. Petrenko M.A. Theoretic bases of pedagogical interaction. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 214, pp. 407-413.
About this article
Author: Gladkih V.G.
Year: 2019
doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-221-21
|
|
Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|