|
|
|
Shevchenko O.N. PROEKTIVOGRAFIYA AS A WAY OF IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF DESIGN ENGINEERING The article discusses proektivografiya way as an alternative to the descriptive geometry for preparation of geometry designers in high school. It is proposed that proektivografiya provides the creative process with the innovation level of creative thought, which is achieved only by special "projective" methods of transformation in agreement with the practice of combinatorial mathematical method based on the study of all possible permutations of spatial elements and their sorting options. Raises the problem of mathematical training of designers, in particular, the lack of knowledge of projective geometry in the educational results. The paper concluded that there was an insufficient geometric component in educational programs of the future designers. The paper highlights the problem of software for creating proektivografic drawings and of its usage by designers for making projects. The article shows the possibility of creating structural and geometric fields with the aid of computer programs using software for automatic construction of complex composite solutions. It is proved that the automation of the process at the stage of development of the concept contributes to the development of a new style, especially when the authors of projects use various computer programs that allow infinite variety of approaches and principles for creating structural and geometric fields and create a special type of video field on screen.Key words: descriptive geometry, proektivografiya, software, design engineering.
References:
1. Kolomiets G.G. Man in the technosphere: the interaction of science and art in the aspect of human creative expression / G.G. Kolomiets –www.pandia.ru/text/79/107/81281.php.
2. Shevchenko, M. N. Geometry and computer science in design education // M.N. Shevchenko, O.N. Shevchenko // Orenburg State University Vestnik. — 2014. №5. p. 205-209.
3. Vinogradova, N. P. Proektivografic method in design of in the design of planar and three-dimensional objects: methods and practice: synopsis, thesis….., Moscow, 2001. — 23 p.
4. Gamayunov, V.N. Proektivografiya. Geometricbasesof artistic design / V.N.Gamayunov // Moscow: MGPI, 1976.– 25 p.
5. Dereva, R.M. Design of three-dimensional ornamental structures: synopsos, thesis….., Moscow, 2006. — 22 p.
6. Ivaschenko, A.V. Automation of obtainingproektivografic drawings of Johnsonbodies // A.V Ivaschenko, T.M. Kondtratieva // Vestnik of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering. -2014. №6.p.179-183.
7. Ivaschenko, A.V., Kondratieva T.M. Proektivografic drawings of multicomponent systems of polyhedra // A.V. Ivaschenko, T.M. Kondratieva // Vestnik of Moscow State University of Civil Engineering. 2012. № 6. p. 155—160.
8. Stolyarova, E.G. Design of structural geometric fields: synopsis, thesis….., Moscow, 2001. — 22 p.
9. Gladkikh, V.G. Creativity of the future designer // V.G. Gladkikh, O.P. Tarasova, O.N. Shevchenko // Higher education in Russia. — 2009. № 3. p. 131-136.
10. Tarasova, O.P. Formation of professional competence of the future designer in his teaching and professional activities // O.P. Tarasova, M.M. Yanshina // Orenburg State University Vestnik. — 2014. №5. p. 210-215.
About this article
Author: Shevchenko O.N.
Year: 2015
|
|
Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|