Vestnik On-line
Orenburg State University named after V.A. Bondarenko october 29, 2026   RU/EN
false
Headings of Vestnik
Pedagogics
Psychology
Other

Search
Vak
Антиплагиат
Orcid
Viniti
ЭБС Лань
Rsl
Лицензия Creative Commons

September 2026, № 3 (251), pages 74-84

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-251-74

Korobeynikova A.A. DEVELOPING COMMUNICATIVE COMPETENCE IN PHILOLOGY STUDENTS THROUGH THE STUDY OF TOLERANT SPEECH COMMUNICATIONIn accordance with the Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education (FGOS VO), it is essential to develop communicative competence in future philologists. Higher education practice faces a persistent contradiction between the traditional format of teaching linguistic disciplines — focused primarily on mastering the language system — and the objective need for graduates to master strategies for verbal interaction in non-standard communicative situations. This gives rise to the need to identify a scientific basis for pedagogical conditions and methodological solutions that foster the conscious, reflective, and practice-oriented development of communicative competence, ensuring it meets the modern challenges of the professional environment and employer requirements. The study aims to provide a theoretical justification for a methodology to develop communicative competence in future philologists based on a comprehensive analysis of conversational dialogues. The new-generation educational standard sets requirements for training practicing philologists within the bachelor’s degree system, emphasizing methods of research and practical activity in the fields of communication and text. Within the anthropocentric paradigm, the focus of professional philological education is on shaping a “linguistic personality” — an individual who not only commands grammar and vocabulary but is also capable of creating and interpreting speech acts while accounting for cultural and situational contexts. Competence, as the core concept of the competence-based approach, encompasses cognitive, operational-technological, motivational, ethical, social, and behavioral components. A “tolerant communicative personality” — capable of establishing constructive dialogue and achieving mutual understanding with individuals whose views, values, or behavioral patterns differ significantly from their own — emerges as the target objective of linguistic education. Knowledge of key concepts in speech-related disciplines, combined with communicative skills at both reproductive and productive levels, constitutes the essence of communicative competence. The development of communicative competence and the study of conversational dialogue are deeply interconnected; the study of one serves as both the foundation and the goal for the other. The level of communicative competence among philology students depends on structuring instruction as a staged process of analytical and speech-based activity (analysis — editing — dialogue creation) grounded in the conceptual framework of communicative pragmatics.Key words: communicative competence, professional competence, philological education, dialogue, communication, tolerance.

Download
References:

1. Baldanova E. A. and Dondokova N. B. (2021) Language education: communicative tolerance as a component of communicative competence. Litera, No. 6. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/language-education-communicative-tolerance-as-a-component-of-communicative-competence (accessed: 20.06.2026).

2. Boyko V. V. (1996) The energy of emotions in communication: a look at oneself and others. Moscow: Information Publishing House “Filin”, 469 p.

3. Borisova I. N. (2005) Russian Conversational Dialogue: Zones of Tolerant and Intolerant Communication. Philosophical and Linguocultural Problems of Tolerance: Collective Monograph. Eds. N. A. Kupina and M. B. Khomyakov. Moscow: OLMA-PRESS, pp. 364–389.

4. Borisova I. N. (2005) Russian Conversational Dialogue: Structure and Dynamics. Moscow: URSS: Lenand, 317 p.

5. Borisova I. N. (2001) Russian Conversational Dialogue: The Problem of Integrativity. Doctoral Dissertation. 10.02.01. Ekaterinburg, 430 p.

6. Vorontsova T. A. and Kopylova T. R. (2021) Tactics of tolerance in everyday dialogical discourse. Bulletin of ChelSU, No. 1 (447). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/taktiki-tolerantnosti-v-bytovom-dialogicheskom-diskurse (accessed: 06.06.2026).

7. Donskova L. A. and Bagirokov Kh. Z. (2017) Psycholinguistic foundations of communicative tolerance of a linguistic personality. Bulletin of Adyghe State University. Series 2: Philology and Art Criticism. No. 1 (192). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/psiholingvisticheskie-osnovy-kommunikativnoy-tolerantnosti-yazykovoy-lichnosti (accessed: 06.06.2026).

8. Zemskaya E. A. (2011) Russian colloquial speech. Linguistic analysis and problems of teaching: a tutorial. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka, 240 p.

9. Zimnyaya I. A. (2009) Key competencies — a new paradigm of educational results. Experiment and innovations at school, No. 2. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/klyuchevye-kompetentsii-novaya-paradigma-rezultata-obrazovaniya (date of access: 20.06.2026).

10. Irgalieva E. K. (2026) Tolerance of University Students: Updated Substantive Characteristics. Vestnik of Orenburg State University, No. 1 (249). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tolerantnost-studentov-vuza-obnovlennye-soderzhatelnye-harakteristiki (date of access: 06.06.2026).

11. Korobaynikova A. A. (2026) Tolerant speech communication: workshop. Orenburg State University named after V. A. Bondarenko. Orenburg: OSU, 101 p.

12. Ashin G. K. et al. (2004) Culture of tolerance: Culture of tolerance and experience of diplomacy: experience of diplomacy for solving modern management problems: textbook. Moscow State Institute of International Relations (University). Under the general editorship of I. G. Tyulin. Moscow: MGIMO-University, 301 p.

13. Lapteva O. A. (1976) Russian colloquial syntax. USSR Academy of Sciences. Institute of Russian language. Moscow: Nauka, 399 p.

14. Marchenko T. V. (2016) Harmonizing Speech Tactics (based on the interview genre). Humanitarian and Legal Studies, No. 3. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/garmoniziruyuschie-rechevye-taktiki-na-materiale-zhanra-intervyu (date of access: 20.06.2026).

15. Mikhailova O. A. (2015) Lingvocultural aspects of tolerance: a teaching aid. Ekaterinburg.

16. Pak L. G. (2026) Semantic guidelines for the development of tolerance in modern university students. Vestnik of the Orenburg State University, No. 1 (249). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/smyslovye-orientiry-formirovaniya-tolerantnosti-sovremennyh-studentov-vuza (accessed: 06.06.2026).

17. Pervova I. L. (2022) Preface. Tolerance and Intolerance in Modern Society: New Realities. Proceedings of the scientific and practical conference, November 15-16, 2022. Saint Petersburg State University. Saint Petersburg, 292 p.

18. Appendix. Federal state educational standard of higher education — bachelor›s degree in the field of training 45.03.01 Philology. Order of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation dated August 12, 2020 N 986 “On approval of the federal state educational standard of higher education — bachelor›s degree in the field of training 45.03.01 Philology” (with amendments and additions). GARANT. URL: https://base.garant.ru/74572878/53f89421bbdaf741eb2d1ecc4ddb4c33/?ysclid=mqm6r3gi3b509908432

19. Prosvirkina I. I. (2007) Tolerant speech communication: linguodidactic theory and practice. Doctoral dissertation. 13.00.02. Place of protection: Peoples› Friendship University of Russia (RUDN). Moscow, 696 p.

20. Ryzhova S. V. (2025) Dynamics of Generalized Trust: Attitudes of Russians during a Period of External Pressure. Information and Analytical Bulletin, No. 2. Interethnic Relations and Metamorphoses of Identities in the Context of Adaptation to Modern Russian Realities, Pp. 4–12. DOI 10.10.19181 / INAB.2025.2.1. EDN APUGWX

21. Sirotina O. B. (1983) Russian Colloquial Speech: A Teacher›s Manual. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 80 p.

22. Dictionary of methodological and general cultural terms. Center for Continuing Education of the A. I. Herzen State Pedagogical Univ. URL: https://mde.rgpu.spb.ru/mod/glossary/print.php?id=24150&mode=letter&hook=К&sortkey&sortorder=asc&offset=0&pagelimit=10 (accessed: 05.05.2026).

23. Chernyshova T. V. (2012) Methods of research and practical activity in the field of communication and text as the most important component of training a bachelor›s and master›s degree in philology. Philology and Man, No. 4. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/metody-issledovatelskoy-i-prakticheskoy-deyatelnosti-v-oblasti-kommunikatsii-i-teksta-kak-vazhneyshaya-sostavlyayuschaya-podgotovki (date of access: 03.06.2026).

24. Sharipova V. A. (2013) Objectification in the language of the functional-cognitive sphere “Speech activity”: based on the Russian and English languages. PhD dissertation. 10.02.20. Place of protection: Kazan. (Volga region) federal. University. Ufa, 256 p.


About this article

Author: Korobeynikova A.A.

Year: 2026

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-251-74

Editor-in-chief
Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

Crossref
Cyberleninka
Doi
Europeanlibrary
Googleacademy
scienceindex
worldcat
© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет имени В.А. Бондаренко (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru
1999–2026 © CIT OSU