november 20, 2024

RU/EN

Headings of Vestnik

May 2017, № 6 (206)

Matyash S.A. ABOUT TYPOLOGY FUNCTION OF POETIC TRANSFERS (ENJAMBEMENTS) IN THE RUSSIAN POETRYIn big literature on poetic transfers (enjambements) there are a lot of judgments concerning functions of this reception in works of art. However these judgments, as a rule, have the nature of separate observations, and the classifications offered by scientists are based on different criteria. The works devoted to typology of functions of transfers no. In the present article the main approaches to interpretation of semantics of transfers come to light and the typology of their functions based on judgment of works of domestic and foreign stikhoved, and also on own researches of the author is offered. On the basis of rate of transfers three types of functions are allocated: the general (universal), private, exclusive — with the subsequent classification of each type. As a result of consideration of the called functions conclusions that are drawn: 1) all transfers have the general functions (increase in emotionality of the text, logical or emotional allocation of the word/phrase, marking of the graphic/expressive beginning of the word); the general functions have universal character; 2) private functions are peculiar not to all transfers; the criterion of their rate is important, but isn't the only thing; creation of transfers with these or those private functions depends on character of the work (his method, a genre, style, etc.) and identity of the poet; 3) private functions don't conflict to the general: concrete transfer, possessing all three general functions, can perform certain private functions; 4) private functions of transfers in real texts can be combined; 5) the list of private functions isn't exhausted by our list and can be replenished, including due to the spread-around exclusive functions.Key words: prosody, versification, poetic syntax, poetic transfer (enjambement), functions of poetic transfer.

Download

References:

1. Timofeev, L.I. Ocherki teorii i istorii russkogo stiha / L.I. Timofeev. — M., 1958. — 415 s.

2. Gasparov, M.L. Perenos / M.L. Gasparov // Literaturnyj ehnciklopedicheskij slovar'. — M., 1987. — S. 274.

3. Gasparov, M.L. Perenos / M.L. Gasparov // Literaturnaya ehnciklopediya terminov i ponyatij / Gl. red. i sost. A.N. Nikolyukin. — M.: Intelvak, 2001. — Stb. 738.

4. Lobanova, M.S. Sintaksicheskaya harakteristika stihovogo perenosa (na materiale rus. poehzii XVIII — pervoj pol. XIX v.): avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk / M.S. Lobanova. — L., 1981. — 24 s.

5. Levinton, G.A. Tri razgovora o lyubvi, poehzii i (anti) gosudarstvennoj sluzhbe. II. Ot vsego cheloveka vam ostaetsya chast' / rechi: (tri zametki o Brodskom) / G.A. Levinton // Rossiya / Russia. — M.-Veneciya, 1998. — S. 256–284.

6. Fedotov, O.I. Osnovy russkogo stihoslozheniya: metrika i ritmika / O.I. Fedotov. — M.: Flinta, 1997. — 335 s.

7. Abisheva, S.D. Poehticheskaya sistema B.Kenzheeva: stih i stil' / S.D. Abisheva // Otechestvennoe stihovedenie: 100-letnie itogi i perspektivy razvitiya. — SPb.: Filologicheskij fakul'tet SPbU, 2010. — S. 205–214.

8. Luzina, L.G. Lingvisticheskaya priroda stihotvornogo perenosa i ego spipisticheskie funkcii (na materiale anglijskoj poehzii XIX veka) : avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk / L.G. Luzina. — M., 1972. — 25 s.

9. Matyash, S.A. Stihotvornyj perenos v poehme A.S.Pushkina «Domik v Kolomne» / S.A. Matyash, A.A. Sutormina // Tret'i mezhdunarodnye Izmajlovskie chteniya, posvyashchennye 170-letiyu priezda v Orenburg A.S.Pushkina, 9–10 oktyabrya 2000. Materialy. — CH.1. — Orenburg: OGPU, 2003. — S. 43–49.

10. Bokusheva, G.A. Stihotvornyj perenos (na materiale poehzii N.A.Nekrasova): dis. … kand. filol. nauk / G.A. Bokusheva. — Karaganda, 2001. — 158 s.

11. Baevskij, V.S. Sintaksicheskij perenos (enjambement) ot SHekspira do Brodskogo: Ontologicheskij argument i statisticheskie dannye / V.S. Baevskij, M.S. Novikova, I.V. Romanova // Slavyanskij stih. — VIII: Stih, yazyk, smysl. — M., 2009. — S. 218–232.

12. Tynyanov, YU.N. Problema stihotvornogo yazyka: stat'i / YU.N. Tynyanov. — L., 1965. — 301 s.

13. Taranovsky, K. Some Problems of Enjambement in Slavic and Western European Verse / K. Taranovsky // JSLP (VII). — The Hague, 1963. — P. 80–87.

14. Golomb, H. Enjambemenl in Poetry: Language and verse in Interaction / H. Golomb. — The Poriev Institute for Poetics and Semiotics Tel Aviv University, 1979. — 343 r.

15. Losev, L. «Na stoletie Anny Ahmatovoj» (1989) / L. Losev // Kak rabotaet stihotvorenie Brodskogo: iz issledovanij slavistov na Zapade. — M.: NLO, 2002. — S. 202–222.

16. Tomashevskij, B.V. Stih i yazyk: filologicheskie ocherki / B.V. Tomashevskij. — M.; L., 1959. — 471 s.

17. Ivleva, T.A. Problema stilya B. Sluckogo i osobennost' ego versifikacionnoj sistemy: avtoref. dis. … kand. filol. nauk / T.A. Ivleva. — M., 1992. — 26 s.

18. Gardzonio, S. Semantika stiha i problema poehticheskogo perevoda: (na materiale ital'yanskoj pushkiniany) / S. Gardzonio // Slavyanskij stih: stihovedenie, lingvistika i poehtika. — M.: Nauka, 1996. — S. 156–163.

19. Bokusheva, G.A. Funkcii perenosov v lirike N.A. Nekrasova / G.A. Bokusheva // Problemy poehtiki i stihovedeniya. — CH.1. — Almaty, 2003. — S. 80–85.

20. Skulacheva, T.V. Poehticheskij perenos v tekstah raznogo stilya (poehmy Bajrona «Korsar» i «Lara») / T.V. Skulacheva // Problemy poehtiki i stihovedeniya: materialy mezhdnarod. nauch. konf., posvyashchennoj 75-letiyu AU im. Abaya i pamyati professora A.L. ZHovtisa. — Almaty, 2003. — CH. 1. — S. 77–80.

21. Tamarchenko, N.D. Tema / N.D. Tamarchenko // Poehtika: slovar' aktual'nyh terminov i ponyatij. — M.: Intrada, 2008. — S. 262.

22. Bryusov, V.YA. Sobranie sochinenij: v semi tomah / V.YA. Bryusov; podgot. teksta i prmech. K.V. Ajvazyana, M.V. Vasil'eva, EH.A. Polockoj, G.A. Tatosyana, R.L. SHCHerbakova. — T. 7. — M.: Hudozh. lit., 1975. — 528 s.

23. Holshevnikov, V.E. Stihovedenie i poehziya / V.E. Holshevnikov. — L., 1991. — 256 s.

24. Matyash, S.A. Struktura i funkcii perenosov (enjambement) v poehme A.S.Pushkina «Bahchisarajskij fontan» / S.A. Matyash // Ontologiya stiha / Pamyati V.E. Holshevnikova. — SPb. — 2000. — S. 142–144.

25. Matyash, S.A. Oppoziciya «provincial'noe-stolichnoe v poehme Pushkina «Domik v Kolomne» / S.A. Matyash.

26. Mednis, N.E. Stihotvornaya poehtika M.YU. Lermontova: avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk / N.E. Mednis. — L., 1971. — 24 s.

27. Voloshina, G.K. Ritmiko-sintaksicheskaya struktura romanticheskih poehm YUliusha Slovackogo / Strukturno-stilisticheskij analiz perenosov i povtorov: avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk / G.K. Voloshina. — M., 1978. — 23 s.

28. Skaftymov

29. CHernec, L.V. Aspekty kompozicii / L.V. CHernec // Vvedenie v literaturovedenie: uchebnoe posobie / Pod. red. L.V. CHernec. — M.: Vyssh shk., 2004. — S. 322–339.

30. Matyash, S.A. O pamyati stihovyh formantov v poehzii Arseniya Tarkovskogo / S.A. Matyash // Pamyat' kak mekhanizm kul'tury v russkom literaturnom processe (pamyati Rimmy Mihajlovny Lazarchuk): materialy Vserossijskoj nauch. konf. s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem 12–14 marta 2014. — CHerepovec, 2014. — S. 78–84.

31 Matyash, S.A. «Zatyazhnoj» perenos v russkom stihotvornom ehpose / S.A. Matyash // Slavyanskij stih.VII Lingvistika i struktura stiha. — M.: YAzyki slavyanskoj kul'tury, 2004. — S. 206–219.

About this article

Author: Matyash S.A.

Year: 2017

Editor-in-chief

Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru