|
|
|
Nikiforova Kh.P. THE SUBJECT OF JUDICIAL CONTROL OVER THE LEGALITY AND VALIDITY OF INVESTIGATIVE ACTIONS, LIMITING CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND FREEDOMSСontrol in the criminal court proceedings is a multifunctional criminal procedure of the judicial authority, carried out in the statutory procedural forms, aimed at implementing the constitutional definition of judicial protection. This paper considers one form of judicial control − judicial control of the legality and validity of investigative actions limiting constitutional rights and freedoms of the individual. The study concluded that the implementation of judicial control over the production of certain investigative actions is an essential issue in the protection of the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of an individual. We offer to supplement article 165 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with paragraph 5.1 as follows: "The cases of urgency should be considered as the situations arising as a result of the need to promptly stop or prevent the commission of the crime, as well as creating the conviction of the examining magistrate and the investigator that the delay in the conduct of investigations may lead to destruction, damage, disappearance or concealment of objects having probative value in a criminal case, a change in their properties and qualities under the influence of certain persons or natural phenomena, in the absence of opportunities to ensure their safety". Part 5, Article 165 of the Code of Criminal Procedure should be reworded as follows: "In exceptional cases, when home inspection, search and seizure in the dwelling, body search and seizure of the thing pledged or deposited in the pawnshop, distraint specified in the Section 104.1 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, is urgent, these investigations can be made on the basis of the examining magistrate's decision or investigator's decision without court decision. The decision of the examining magistrate and the investigator motivate the impossibility of conducting investigations in the manner prescribed by parts 1-4 of this article.(hereafter referred to as)". Key words: provision of individual rights, international law, protection, principles of criminal procedure, limitation of a right, judicial review
References:
1. Adilshaev, E.A. Judicial Authorization as a Form of Realization of Justice in Criminal Legal Procedure of Russia: monograph / E. A. Adilshaev, I.V. Zherebyatyev, A.A. Shamardin. − Orenburg: IPK "University", 2013. − 181 p.
2. 2012 Archive of Orenburg Regional Court, Case № 3-111 accusing P. according to Part 2, Article 158 of the Russian Federation Criminal Code.
3. 2011 Archive of Leninsky District Court of Orenburg, Case № 2-162 accusing S. according to Part 1, Article 105 of the Russian Federation Criminal Code.
4. 2012 Archive of Leninsky District Court of Orenburg 2012, Case № 3-12 accusing K. according to Part 1, Article 158 of the Russian Federation Criminal Code.
5. Bykov, V.M Actual Problems of the Criminal Justice / V.M. Bykov. − Kazan: Cognition, 2008. − 210 p.
6. Ilyin, A.N. Tactics of Preliminary Examination Report about Crime / A.N. Ilyin. − M. − 2009. − P.129.
7. Kalnitsky, V.V. "Authorization" and Сontrol of Legality for Investigative Actions by the Court During the Pre-Trial Proceedings are not Effective / V.V. Kalnitsky // Criminal Law. − 2004.− №1. − P.73
8. Kozubenko, Y. Criminal Proceedings in the Chinese People''s Republic and the US / U.V. Kozubenko // Russian Law Journal. − Ekaterinburg: UrSLA Publishing House. − 2011. − № 3 (78). − P. 191- 196.
9. Kurchenko, V.N. Major Errors Made by Judges when Considering Applications for Search and Seizure / V.N. Kurchenko // Criminal Proceedings. − 2012. − № 4. − P. 55.
10. Nikiforova, Kh.P. International Protection of Individual for Sanctity of the Home in Criminal Legal Procedure / Kh.P. Nikiforova // Bulletin of the Orenburg State University. − 2010. − № 3. − P. 129.
11. Solodilov, A.V. Judicial Review of Conduct of Investigative Actions and Decisions of Prosecutor and Investigating Authorities, Limiting The Constitutional Rights and Freedoms of Citizens in Criminal Legal Procedure of Russia: Abstract of dissertation ... candidate of legal sciences /A.V. Solodilov. − Tomsk, 1999. − P. 23.
12. Chinese People''s Republic Code of Criminal Procedure // Adopted at the II session of the National People''s Congress of the 5th Convocation July 1, 1979 as amended. March 17, 1996 [electronic resource]. — URL: http: //asia-business.ru/law/law1/criminal/procedurallaw/
13. Fokov, A.P. Problem of Judicial Control over the Execution of Laws during Preliminary Investigation (Comparative Analysis of Russian and French Legislation): Abstract of dissertation ... candidate of legal sciences / A.P. Fokov. − M.: Research Institute of Russian Procurator General Office, 2000. − P. 16.
14. Himicheva, G.P. Pre-Trial Proceedings in Criminal Cases: Concept of Improving Criminal Procedure / G.P. Himicheva. — M., 2003. − P. 302.
15. Shabarin, V.V. Observance of Principle for Sanctity of the Home in the Course of Investigation / V.V. Shabarin // St. — Petersburg University Bulletin. − №3. − 2012. − P. 81
16. Shiretorova, L.P. Criminal Procedural Guarantees of Rights of the Accused Person under the Laws of the Russian Federation and the People''s Republic of China / L.P. Shiretorova // Comparative Law in the Asia-Pacific region. Proceedings of the International Scientific-Practical Conference (Ulan-Ude, 15-16 June 2007). − Ulan-Ude: Publishing House of Buryatia University. − 2007. − P. 132- 134.
About this article
Author: Nikiforova H.P.
Year: 2015
|
|
Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|