Petruneva R.M., Efimov E.G., Avdeyuk O.A., Chudasova T.D.
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN EDUCATION: OPINIONS OF STUDENTS AND TEACHERS (BASED ON THE EXAMPLE OF VOLGOGRAD STATE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY) ^{[№ 3 ' 2024]}
Digital tools based on artificial intelligence are widely introduced into the educational process. At the same time, there is no clear opinion about the effectiveness of using this technology, its pedagogical feasibility yet, either in the pedagogical environment or among students. We conducted a study of the use of artificial intelligence systems in the educational process of higher education using the example of Volgograd State Technical University. The opinion of teachers and students about the use of this resource in the educational process was studied. The survey was conducted using a Google form. The study assessed the attitude of respondents, students and teachers separately, to the use of educational resources based on artificial intelligence in the educational process, the awareness of these cohorts of respondents about its capabilities as a didactic tool, and the prospects for the widespread introduction of this tool into educational activities. The results of this study showed, among other things, a certain confusion among teachers regarding the use of artificial intelligence in the educational process. Some teachers believe that they are able to understand without the Antiplagiat system whether students have used "virtual assistants", while others have not encountered this phenomenon at all. The attitude of teachers towards the use of this resource by students also varies. Students do not see any particular problems in using the "virtual assistant", especially in routine processes. However, it should be noted that both teachers and students see the need for legal and ethical regulation of the use of this tool in educational activities. The results of the study show that, despite the generally positive attitude of teachers and students towards digital educational technologies, higher education is not ready to use these technologies on a large scale, since there is no regulatory framework, methodological justification and methodological support.