|
|
|
March 2018, № 3 (215), pages 90–96doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-215-90
Kolosova T.A., Golikov D.V. MOTIVATION FOR ADMISSION TO THE FAMILY OF CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIESThe motive of accepting a child with limited health opportunities into the family is one of the important factors of the mutual adaptation of the child and the replacement family. The study of the motivation of admission to the family of a child with limited health opportunities allows you to create an effective psychological and pedagogical support. As a result of the study, it was possible to establish the dominant motives of mothers who took children with disabilities and with normal development into the family. For mothers of both groups, the leading motives are “the desire to pull the child out of the state system of education”, “the desire to help at least one child.” At the same time, one of the leading motives for mothers who adopt a child with LHO is the motive of “solving material problems at the expense of foster children”, while for other mothers this motive is defined as not the leading one. Mothers who have adopted children with impaired development are more characterized by higher rates for all types of empathy, as well as the total rate of empathy, however, no significant differences were found. Mothers who adopt children with LHO are more dependent on public opinion, they are more susceptible to social impact. The desire to look worthy,” to be no worse than others “ leads to the fact that such women take on the education of a child with LHO. With age, women are less willing to take in the family and raise their children. There is evidence in favor of the fact that an increase in the number of children the level of empathy of the parents is reduced; less expressed, installation, promote empathy; the parents believe that they can count on help in old age.Key words: limited health opportunities, motivation, foster family, motivation for admission to the family
References:
1. Kotova T.E. Social‘no-psihologicheskie i lichnostnye harakteristiki gotovnosti k zameshchayushchemu roditel‘stvu. Extended abstract of candidate's thesis. YAroslavl‘, 2011, 26 p.
2. Kuftyak E.V., Tihonova I.V. Zameshchayushchij roditel‘ ot kandidata k professionalu [Substituting parent: from candidate to professional]. Kostroma: KGU im. N.A. Nekrasova, 2010, 103 p.
3. Martynova E.V. Funkcionirovanie social‘nogo instituta priemnoj sem‘i v usloviyah sovremennogo rossijskogo sociuma. Candidate's thesis. Rostov-na-Donu, 2008, 207 p.
4. Oslon V.N. ZHizneustrojstvo detej-sirot: professional‘naya zameshchayushchaya sem‘ya [Life-support of orphaned children: a professional substitute family]. M.: Genezis, 2006, 368 p.
5. Palamarchuk E.M. Motivaciya prinyatiya rebenka v sem‘yu kak faktor uspeshnosti zameshchayushchego roditel‘stva. Nauchno-pedagogicheskoe obozrenie [Scientific and pedagogical review], 2016, no. 2 (12), pp. 31–37.
6. Palieva N.A., Savchenko V.V., Solomatina G.N. Motivaciya prinyatiya priemnogo rebenka v priemnuyu sem‘yu. Obshchestvo. Sreda. Razvitie (Terra Humana) [Society. Environment. Development (Terra Humana)], 2011, no. 1, pp. 132–137.
7. Pechnikova L.S., ZHujkova E.B. Osobennosti detsko-roditel‘skih otnoshenij v priemnyh sem‘yah. Semejnaya psihologiya [Family psychology], 2005, no. 4, pp. 32–46.
8. Sem‘ya G.V. Politika deinstitucionalizacii uchrezhdenij internatnogo tipa. Detskij dom [Orphanage], 2005, no. 4 (17), pp. 2–7.
9. Tihonova I.V. Ozhidaniya ot priema detej v sem‘yu kak harakteristika motivov kandidatov v zameshchayushchie roditeli. Vestnik KGU im. N.A. Nekrasova [Bulletin of KSU named after. ON. Nekrasov], 2014, vol. 20, no. 4.
10. Tyugashev E.A., Popkova T.V. Sem‘evedenie: uchebnoe posobie [Family Studies: A Training Manual]. Novosibirsk. SibUPK, 2002, 115 p.
11. Fedotova K.P. Priemnaya sem‘ya: problemy i teoreticheskie podhody k ih resheniyu. Social‘noe obsluzhivanie semej i detej: nauchno-metodicheskij sbornik. Socializaciya detej v social‘no opasnom polozhenii, detej-sirot i detej, ostavshihsya bez popecheniya roditelej. Opyt uchrezhdenij social‘nogo obsluzhivaniya [Social services for families and children: a scientific and methodological collection. Socialization of children in socially dangerous situations, orphans and children left without parental care. Experience of social service institutions], 2016, no. 7, pp. 40–49.
12. Shipicyna L.M. Psihologiya detej-sirot: Uchebnoe posobie [Psychology of orphans]. SPb.: Izd-vo SPb un-ta, 2005, 628 p.
13. Verbenina E. Interv'yu s L.V. Golubevoj. Miloserdie.ru Pravoslavnyj portal blagotvoritel'nosti [Miloserdiye.ru Orthodox portal of charity]. Available at: https://www.miloserdie.ru/article/pochemu-detej-obratno-vozvrashhayut-v-detdom/. Accessed: 06.03.2018.
14. Semejnoe ustrojstvo detej, ostavshihsya bez popecheniya roditelej. Statistika ministerstva obrazovaniya RF. Internet-proekt Ministerstva obrazovanyai i nauki RF. Departament gosudarstvennoc politiki v sfere zashchity detej [Internet project of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation. Department of State Policy in the field of child protection]. Available at: https://www.usynovite.ru/statistics/2014/1/. Accessed: 06.03.2018.
15. Trudnosti roditelej, vospityvayushchih detej s OVZ. Infourok [Informational lesson]. Available at: https://infourok.ru/statya-na-temu-trudnosti-roditeley-vospitivayuschih-detey-s-ovz-1154897.html. Accessed: 06.03.2018.
16. Sovremennye problemy sem'i s det'mi s OVZ [Modern problems of the family with children with HIA]. Available at: https://infourok.ru/sovremennie-problemi-semi-s-detmi-s-ovz-726587.html. Accessed: 06.03.2018.
About this article
Authors: Kolosova T.A., Golikov D.V.
Year: 2018
doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-215-90
|
|
Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|