February 2018, № 2 (214), pages 25–32

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-214-25

Gamova N.A., Kulish N.V., Sikorskaya G.A. PEDAGOCICAL SUPERVISION IN LEARNING MATHEMATICSDemand for graduate degrees are growing, thus necessity for more effective educational supervision occurs. Better the supervision, better result of students. If organization of students’ studying process improves, their abilities will mount. With correction and diagnosing problems in studying it`s possible to improve students` self-awareness in education process. Main aim of educational supervision is to get information about process as whole. In the studying process pedagocical supervision was created by providing all students variety of tasks with character oriented studying. In particular, it’s provided by tests and quizzes with public access, using modern technology, including possibility of real time remote studying. Pedagogical supervision of students has improved feedback for teacher’s work on consecutive steps of educational process. With character oriented studying students got mathematical skills for tackling practical tasks. They learnt how to use mathematical language and its symbols to construct managerial models and they have learnt how to improve their methods of studying on each steps of educational process. Key words: pedagogical supervision, supervision in studying mathematics, functions of supervision.

Download

References:

1. Kulish N.V. Kontrol' znanij studentov kak problema kachestva obrazovaniya. Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya obrazovaniya v Rossii: I Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferenciya [Problems and possibilities of education in Russia: First International science conference]. Novosibirsk: SIBPRINT, 2010, pp. 309–315.

2. Volynkin V.I. Pedagogicheskoe soprovozhdenie v sociokul'turnoj deyatel'nosti: monografiya [Pedagogical supervision in sociocultural activities: monography]. Astrahan': Astrahanskij un-t, 2011, 229 p.

3. Manuzina E.B. Pedagogicheskoe soprovozhdenie studentov v obrazovatel'nyh uchrezhdeniyah vysshego professional'nogo obrazovaniya. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Vestnik of Tomskiy state university], 2011, no. 1, pp. 109–113.

4. Pichugina G.V. Pedagogicheskoe soprovozhdenie i pedagogicheskaya podderzhka obuchayushchihsya v tekhnologicheskom obrazovanii. SHkola i proizvodstvo [School and Production], 2015, no. 8, pp. 3–6.

5. Ponomareva L.I. Sootnoshenie paradigm soprovozhdeniya i podderzhki v pedagogicheskoj teorii i praktike. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii [Pedagogical education in Russia], 2014, no. 10, pp. 171–174.

6. Solodovnikova T.V. Genezis ponyatiya «pedagogicheskoe soprovozhdenie». Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Izvestia of Volgogradskiy state pedagogical university], 2014, no. 4 (89), pp. 38–43.

7. YAkovleva N.O. Soprovozhdenie kak pedagogicheskaya deyatel'nost'. Vestnik YUzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Vestnik of Southern Ural state university], 2012, no. 4 (263), pp. 46–49.

8. Berry O Donovan,Chris Rust, Margaret Price A scholarly approach to solving the feedback dilemma in practice. 2015, pp. 938–949. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1052774.

9. Laal M., Ghodsi S.M. Benefits of collaborative learning. Journal of Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 31, pp. 486–490; Laal M. Collaborative learning: what is it? Journal of Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 31, pp. 491–495.

10. M. Laal, Khattami-Kermanshahi Zh. 21st century learning; learning in collaboration. Journal of Procedia, 2012, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, pp. 1696–1701.

11. B. Alden et al. Using student experience as a model for designing an automatic feedback system for short essays. International Journal of e-Assessment, 2014, 4(1), article no. 68.

12. Adie L. The development of teacher assessment identity through participation in online moderation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2013, 20, pp. 91–106, doi:10.1080/096 9594X.2011.650150.

13. Cowie B., Moreland J. Leveraging disciplinary practices to support students’ active participation in formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2015, 22, pp. 247–264, doi:10.1080/0969594X.2015.1015960.

14. Gotch C.M., French B.F. A systematic review of assessment literacy measures. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 2014, 33, pp. 14–18, doi:10.1111/emip.12030.

15. Edwards R., Eds. Paechter C., Preedy M., Scott D., Soler J. Meeting individual learner needs: power, subject, subjection. Knowledge, Power and Learning. London : SAGE, 2001, pp. 37–46.

About this article

Authors: Gamova N.A., Kulish N.V., Sikorskaya G.A.

Year: 2018

doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-214-25

Editor-in-chief

Sergey Aleksandrovich
MIROSHNIKOV

© Электронное периодическое издание: ВЕСТНИК ОГУ on-line (VESTNIK OSU on-line), ISSN on-line 1814-6465
Зарегистрировано в Федеральной службе по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий и массовых коммуникаций
Свидетельство о регистрации СМИ: Эл № ФС77-37678 от 29 сентября 2009 г.
Учредитель: Оренбургский государственный университет (ОГУ)
Главный редактор: С.А. Мирошников
Адрес редакции: 460018, г. Оренбург, проспект Победы, д. 13, к. 2335
Тел./факс: (3532)37-27-78 E-mail: vestnik@mail.osu.ru