|
|
|
October 2017, № 11 (211), pages 79–83doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-211-79
Dusaeva G.H., Maksutova N.V. SEASONAL DINAMICA STOCKS OF ABOVEGROUND PHYTOMASS IN GRASSLAND IS PREDOMINANT FORMATIONS ARE-FESCUE-SALESMOBILE COMMUNITY WITH POA TRANSBAICALICA AND SPIRAEA CRENATAThe article presents the results of a study conducted in 2016 on the territory of the “Burtinskaya steppe” Reserve “Orenburg”. Seasonal dinamica reserves of the top phytomass was studied on the example of herb-predominant formations are-fescue-salesmobile (Stipa zalesskii, Festuca valesiaca, Helictotrichon desertorum, Herbae stepposae) soobshestve with Poa transbaicalica and Spiraea crenata. The accumulation and decomposition of vegetable substances are the most important characteristics of the ecosystem. Stock change of aboveground phytomass can be called as natural causes, such as meteorological conditions and anthropogenic impacts. Follow-up of these phenomena on the territory of the protected area allows you to separate these factors. To study the reserves of the top phytomass in the protected steppe, which is considered as the reference ecosystem was the analysis of processes of accumulation and distribution in connection with the variability of weather conditions of vegetation period. These indicators are specific phytocenosis and reflect his adaptation to the environment. The study of seasonal development showed that within the four seasons of the year are allocated Padsasonny or periods that are characterized by the presence of groups of species with similar phenological rhythm of development or, on the contrary, similar processes of dying. In the studied community during the period of the growing season, we were allocated another Padsasonny or periods: rannevesennem, spring, ranelate, summer, late summer and autumn. Key words: seasonal dynamics of stocks of aboveground phytomass, plant communities, vegetation periods.
References:
1. Bazilevich N. And. Methods of studying the biological turnover in different natural zones [Text] / N. And. Bazilevich, A. A. Titlyanova, And V. V. Smirnov, L. E. Rodin, N. And. Nechaev, I. Levin, F. — M, 1978. — 183 S.
2. Bazilevich N. And. The productivity of the strictly protected meadow steppe of the Central Chernozem biosphere reserve [Text]/ N. And. Bazilevich, I. E. Shmakova // Bulletin MOIP. otd.Biol. — 1984, vol 89. — C. 94-107
3. Walter, G. the foundations of Botanical geography [Text] / G. Walter, B. M. Alekhin, L.: Biomedgiz, 1936. — 715 p.
4. Danilov V. I. On some issues of the annual dynamics of steppe phytocenoses [Text] / V. I. Danilov // Bulletin MOIP. otd.Biol. — 1981. — T. 86. — C. 106-120
5. Kalinina A. B. Phenology and productivity of steppe and desert grass the Mongolian people’s Republic [Text] / V. A. Kalinin // Phenological characteristics of plants in relation to their geography and productivity: collection of articles. — Leningrad, 1972. — S. 89 — 104.
6. The red book of soils of Orenburg region [Text] / A. I. Klimentyev, A. A. Chibilev, E. V., Blokhin, I. V. Groshev. — Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Uro ran, 2001. — 294 p.
7. Quick guide for geobotanical studies in connection with field afforestation and the creation of a stable fodder base in the South of the European part of the USSR [Text] / ed. by V. N. Sukachev, E. M. Lavrenko. E. M. — M.: Izd-vo an SSSR, 1952. — 190 p.
8. Biocomplexity research in Kazakhstan. Part 3. A comprehensive description of the main plant communities of desert steppe of Central Kazakhstan [Text] / ed. by E. M. Lavrenko. — L.: Nauka, 1976. — 292 p.
9. Field geobotany [Text] / ed. by E. M. Lavrenko, A. And Korchagina, Vol III. — Leningrad, publishing house of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1964. — 524 p.
10. Field geobotany [Text] / ed. by E. M. Lavrenko, A. And Korchagina, Vol IV. — Leningrad, publishing house of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1972. — 330 p.
11. The steppe reserve “Orenburg”. Physico-geographical and ecological characteristics [Text] / Ed. A. A. Chibilyov. — Ekaterinburg, 1996. — 167 p
12. Yaroshenko P. D. Geobotany [Text] / P. D. Yaroshenko. — Moscow; Leningrad: Education, 1961. — 474 p.
13. Swemmer, A. M., Knapp A. K., Snyman, H. A. Intraseasonal precipitation patterns and above-ground productivity in three perennial grasslands [Text] / A. M. Swemmer, Knapp A. K., Snyman, H. A. //Journal of Ecology/ — 2007. — No. 95. — P. 780-788.
14. Guo Qun, LI Shenggong, Zhongmin HU, Zhao Wei, YU Guirui1, Xiaomin1 Sun, Linghao LI, Liang Naishen, BAI Wenming. Responses of gross primary productivity to different sizes of precipitation events in a temperate grassland ecosystem in Inner Mongolia, China [Text]/ Guo Qun, LI Shenggong, Zhongmin HU, ZHAO Wei, YU Guirui1, Xiaomin1 SUN, Linghao LI, LIANG Naishen, BAI Wenming./ Arid Land// — 2016. — №8 (1). — P. 36-46.
15. Smart, A. J., B. H. Dunn, P. S. Johnson, Gates R. N. Using weather data to explain herbage yield on three Great Plains plant communities [Text]/ A. J. Smart, B. H. Dunn, P. S. Johnson , R. N. Gates // Journal of Range Management — 2007. — No. 60. — P. 146-153.
16. Shiflet, T. N., Dietz H. E. Relationship between precipitation and annual rangeland herbage production in Southeastern Kansas [Text]/ T. N. Shiflet, and H. E. Dietz / Journal of Range Management// — 1974. — №27. — P. 272-276.
17. Oesterheld, M., Loreti, J., Semmartin M., Sala O. E. Inter-annual variation in primary production of a semi-arid grassland related to previous-year production[Text]/ M. Loreti Oesterheld , J. M. Semmartin, and O. E. Sala /Journal of Vegetation Science// — 2001. — 12. — P. 137-142.
18. Weather archive [Electronic resource] https://rp5.ru/
About this article
Authors: Dusaeva G.H., Maksutova N.V.
Year: 2017
doi: 10.25198/1814-6457-211-79
|
|
Editor-in-chief |
Sergey Aleksandrovich MIROSHNIKOV |
|
|